A relutância dos autores brasileiros em publicar em revistas brasileiras é histórica e não mais se justifica. Atualmente, vários periódicos brasileiros estão indexados em bases internacionais, cujas versões em inglês permitem a divulgação de nossos estudos a países estrangeiros. Os autores expressam seu ponto de vista quanto à importância da publicação em revistas brasileiras e citam o exemplo do impacto das publicações do Instituto do Coração - InCor- HC-FMUSP nos últimos dois anos.

The reluctance of Brazilian authors to publish in Brazilian journals is historical and no longer justified. Currently, several Brazilian journals are indexed in international databases, of which English versions allow disclosure of our studies to foreign countries. The authors express their views on the importance of publishing in national journals and cite the example of the impact of publications from Instituto do Coração - InCor-HCFMUSP in the past two years.

La negativa de los autores brasileños en publicar en las revistas brasileñas, es algo que ha pasado a la historia y que no tiene más sentido. Hoy por hoy, varias publicaciones brasileñas están indexadas a las bases de datos internacionales, cuyas versiones en inglés permiten la divulgación de nuestros estudios a países extranjeros. Los autores expresan su punto de vista en cuanto a la importancia de la publicación en las revistas brasileñas y citan el ejemplo del impacto de las publicaciones del Instituto do Coração (InCor) HC-FMUSP en los últimos dos años.

INTRODUCTION: The present study was motivated by the need to systematically assess the research productivity of the Heart Institute (InCor), Medical School of the University of São Paulo, Brazil. OBJECTIVE: To explore methodology for the assessment of institutional scientific research productivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bibliometric indicators based on searches for author affiliation of original scientific articles or reviews published in journals indexed in the databases Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and SciELO from January 2000 to December 2003 were used in this study. The retrieved records were analyzed according to the index parameters of the journals and modes of access. The number of citations was used to calculate the institutional impact factor. RESULTS: Out of 1253 records retrieved from the five databases, 604 original articles and reviews were analyzed; of these, 246 (41%) articles were published in national journals and 221 (90%) of those were in journals with free online access through SciELO or their own websites. Of the 358 articles published in international journals, 333 (93%) had controlled online access and 223 (67%) were available through the Capes Portal of Journals. The average impact of each article for InCor was 2.224 in the period studied. CONCLUSION: A simple and practical methodology to evaluate the scientific production of health research institutions includes searches in the LILACS database for national journals and in MEDLINE and the Web of Science for international journals. The institutional impact factor of articles indexed in the Web of Science may serve as a measure by which to assess and review the scientific productivity of a research institution.